One question investors considering a 1031 exchange often ask is: Is there a holding period for property acquired in a like-kind exchange? Must you hold a replacement property for a certain amount of time before gifting, selling, or exchanging it?


Is There a Holding Period for Property Acquired in a Like-Kind Exchange?

Oct 17, 2017

I was speaking to a lawyer friend the other day when he relayed an unpleasant reality of his profession: “Sometimes, laws are complex simply to give more power to lawyers.” Sad as it is to admit, some legal language is complicated for no other reason than it can be.

Unfortunately, certain technicalities in 1031 exchanges seem to follow this trend. It is often necessary to trudge through superfluous legal jargon to understand the meaning behind the language.

Take, for example, the 1031 exchange holding requirement. To some, this phrasing could imply that there is a time period for which property must be held in a 1031 exchange. Thus, one of the most frequent questions we get from investors considering a 1031 exchange is: Is there a holding period for property acquired in a like-kind exchange? That is, must investors hold a replacement property for a certain amount of time before gifting, selling, or exchanging it to be deemed permissible in a 1031 exchange? Let’s take a closer look.

Is There a Holding Period for Property Acquired in a Like-Kind Exchange?

The simple answer to this question is, “No.” There is no firm requirement for the amount of time you must hold a replacement property before you sell or exchange it.

The holding requirement—also referred to as the “held for” requirement—emanates from the language of section 1031 that states that the real property being exchanged must be “held for productive use in trade or business or for investment.”

This means, the holding requirement is based more on how the property is used—specifically, continuity of ownership and taxpayer intent—rather than a specific time period.

1031 Exchange Holding Requirement: Continuity of Ownership and Taxpayer Intent

There are two general principles you can use to determine whether you’ve met the holding requirement for a 1031 exchange: continuity of ownership and taxpayer intent.

Continuity of ownership: If you want to ensure that you are in compliance with the holding requirement, you need to be certain that the same person or entity who disposes of the relinquished property also acquires the replacement property in a 1031 exchange. A good example of a section 1031 transaction that does not follow this principle is one in which a taxpayer immediately gifted his or her newly acquired replacement property to a friend or relative. The IRS would claim that this rapid change in ownership should disqualify the transaction from non-recognition treatment under section 1031 and would assess a tax deficiency.

Taxpayer intent: Your intent is also a major part of the holding requirement. Courts will view your actions in their entirety and then infer intent based on the substance of your actions rather than their form. Are you giving property to a friend or relative to use as a residence, rather than to hold it for investment or productive use in trade or business? If this is the case, then the court will undoubtedly piece together this intent by carefully examining the totality of your actions and render your exchange invalid for 1031 treatment.

Understanding the 1031 Exchange Holding Requirement: An Example

An excellent case to examine for guidance on the holding requirement in 1031 exchange transactions is Magneson v. Commissioner. Though it is not a recent case, it provides a good example of how the continuity of ownership and taxpayer intent principles operate.

In this case, the taxpayer exchanged a piece of real property for a 10% interest in a larger piece of real property. The taxpayer then immediately transferred his ownership interest to a limited partnership. The IRS argued that this transfer disbarred non-recognition treatment because the holding requirement had not been met.

The court rejected this argument made by the IRS: Though the taxpayer transferred his interest to a general partnership, the purpose of the partnership was to continue holding the property for investment, so the court determined that the holding requirement had in fact been satisfied.

The key point to take away from this is that the holding requirement is not fundamentally about holding real property for a specific period of time. Rather, it is about the true nature of your actions preceding, during, and following the exchange.

Please contact us to learn more about investing with CWS Capital Partners, or view our current offerings by completing our self-certification form for accredited or qualified investors.



The information provided here is for your general informational purposes only. It should not be considered a recommendation or personalized advisory advice. CWS has made this third party information available from authors it believes are knowledgeable and reliable resources. However, its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed and sentiment may change due to legal or economic conditions.

All investments involve risk including the possible loss of principal. You should familiarize yourself with all risks associated with any investment product before investing.

Advisory services are provided by CWS Capital Partners LLC, a registered investment advisor.

Securities offered by CWS Capital Partners LLC are through an affiliated entity, CWS Investments. CWS Investments is a registered Broker Dealer, member FINRA, SIPC.

If you would like to receive an e-alert when a new blog article is posted, please sign up below.

E-Alert Lists *